Patterns of Adoption of Electronic Publishing Innovations among Nigerian Publishers — Emmanuel Ifeduba and Godwin Shoki

Abstract

This study investigates patterns of electronic publishing innovations among Nigerian publishers. The survey method was employed using a questionnaire, interview guide and observation guide. The results show that electronic publishing innovations were adopted by the majority of the publishers and printers. The study concludes that Nigerian publishers adopted only those innovations that have become imperative for their success while slowly adopting others, especially ones that make the least demand on their finances. Their level of commitment favours foreign publishers whose products they market and whose facilities they use for online distribution.

The Study

There are indications that electronic publishing is becoming a major mode of publishing in many countries. Tiamiyu (2005, p. 147) observes:

“The global information and electronic revolution continues to transform the different publishing processes, from manuscript development, through book production, distribution and marketing, to financial accounting and business management.”

As e–publishing continues to account for greater percentages of published works in this era of globalization, an understanding of the principles and acquisition of the skills becomes imperative for Nigerian publishers. The need to embrace the change is made more obvious from views expressed by local book printers who operate in a technologically changing environment.

According to Uchenunu (2005, p. 22), Nigerian printers are keeping their minds open for new ways and have accepted that their clients demand consistent adoption of innovations to keep their global image. He states that print operators in Nigeria are beginning to embrace the inevitable change. There are nine Heidelberg Direct Imaging (D.I.) machines located at six D.I. centres across the country. With these machines, a step is taken towards total digitization. He states:

“By downloading straight from the Internet, zip, CD, etc. without colour separation on films, D.I. printing has removed human error easily noticed in other conventional print processes … buyers enjoy impeccable print quality comparable to the best in the world.”

Another development is that the government is already thinking of assisting in the provision of some basic infrastructure to make e–publishing feasible in Nigeria. Adio (2004, p. 41) states:

“Nigeria cannot afford to exist outside the new world information order. Thus the present idea of the Nigerian University Commission on a Virtual Digital Library that links the university libraries to the world is a welcome idea, and this will serve as an impetus to other higher institutions, public and special institutional libraries to chart a new course in the discharge of their responsibilities.”

Implicit in this statement is that publishers who fail to digitize their current lists and future titles may lose out in the emerging e–publishing market, thereby leaving Nigerian readers to the mercy of foreign publishers.

Though there seem to be indications of adoption, some think that Nigerian publishers are yet to adopt relevant innovations in large numbers. This is the position of Nwankwo (2005, p. 173–83). He states that what the local publishers need to acquire in order to get involved include:

Nwankwo’s experimentations with Print on Demand (POD) also show that some attempts are being made to embrace e–publishing innovations. Obidiegwu (2006, p. 10) also says that “there is only a tiny (local) market,” arguing that “Nigerian publishers can reach out to European and American markets… .” These views, counter views and insights call for investigation of the status of e–publishing innovations among Nigerian publishers.

Problems

There is a paucity of empirical evidence on the status of electronic publishing innovations in Nigeria, probably due to the newness of e–publishing. There are, however, signs of adoption of e–publishing innovations. The discernible signs, though, may not serve as sufficient basis for categorical statements on the subject. This study therefore seeks to investigate the aspects of e–publishing adopted by Nigerian publishers, the extent of adoption and the different ways which print book publishers, book printers, optical disc publishers and booksellers have adopted or failed to adopt them.

Answers Will Be Provided To the Following Questions:

  1. What are the discernible patterns of adoption of e–publishing innovations among the four segments of the publishing industry — print book publishers, book printers, optical disc publishers and booksellers?

  2. What are the views of the publishers on the adoption of e–publishing innovations in Nigeria?

Theoretical Framework

This study is conducted using the Innovation Diffusion Theory and the Technological Determinism Theory. Nwodu (2006, p. 102) defines innovation diffusion as the:

“strategic exposure of change target to new idea, object or practice or practice (that is, innovation) in a manner that they would pay attention to understand, internalize and adopt the new idea, object or practice (which is diffusion) for their own benefit.”

According to Nwodu (2006) diffusion means the spread of a given new idea or practice over time, via specifiable channels through some social structures:

“This theory assumes the existence of change targets. That there are change agents who are responsible for the introduction of new ideas or practices. That diffusion is hardly in effect. That the process of diffusion may be fast on.”

Methodology

The descriptive survey research method was employed. Its population was of traditional paperback publishing firms, book printers, bookshops, and optical disc and cassette makers in Nigeria. Stratified and simple sampling techniques were used on a proportion of respondents in Southwest Nigeria as seen below:

 

Table 1: Proportion of Publishers in the Southwest Zone.
Source: NPA, NCC and ANP secretariats.
Serial NumberPopulation StrataNationalSouthwestPercent
1Publishers12789*70.6
2Printers191136*73.5
3Optical Disc publishersNA15 
4BooksellersNANA 
 Total31824072.1

 

Since the focus of this study is on the patterns of adoption, it is considered appropriate, in the light of these scholarly positions, to describe the patterns observed among the four strata of the publishing industry.

The number of organizations that make up the population is too large to allow for individual examination in this study. It becomes necessary, therefore, to narrow down the scope by way of sampling. (See Appendices 1–3 for a comprehensive list of the members of the Nigerian Publishers Association (NPA), Association of Nigerian Printers (ANP), and the Nigerian Copyrights Commission (NCC)).

Scope

The scope of the study is delineated in the terms of space and time. The unwieldy geographical size of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the thousands of printers, publishers and CD replication studios scattered across the 36 states and the limited resources available for the study necessitates that the scope be limited to printers and publishers in the southwestern geo–political zone of Nigeria. The Southwest, comprising Lagos, Oyo, Ogun, Ondo, Osun, and Ekiti states, is most suited in the sense that well over 72 percent of the population live in that zone.

Research Instruments

Four instruments suitable for survey research were designed to gather data. They were:

  1. Questionnaire

  2. Interview guide for book printers

  3. Interview guide for optical disc publishers

  4. Observation guide for bookshops

For the publishers, a 24–item questionnaire was designed containing ordinal, nominal, screener and other relevant question types. For the printers, who are generally not as literate as the publishers, a 19–item interview guide was designed while a 16–item interview guide was designed to collect data from publishers of optical discs. Observation was employed to examine the available electronic book products in bookshops. The observation guide contains a list of nine electronic book products.

Presentation and Discussion of Data

The data are presented in the following order: Hardware innovations, software innovations, skill acquisition innovations, Internet conduit innovations, marketing/distribution innovations, and e–product innovations under each question.

 

Table 2: Identified Hardware Innovations.
Serial NumberHardware FeaturesAvailableNot Available
1ComputersAvailable 
2Compact discsAvailable 
3DiskettesAvailable 
4POD printing machines Not Available
5Laser filmsAvailable 
6Camera–ready artworkAvailable 
 Total51

 

Out of the six general hardware features identified, five are present among local publishers while one (POD printing machines) is not available among the sampled publishers. Neither the book printers/disc publishers nor the print book publishers indicated that they have seen the machine.

 

Table 3: Identified Software Innovations.
Serial NumberSoftware FeaturesAvailableNot Available
1Typesetting/Design packagesAvailable 
2Setting up/interchange softwareAvailable 
3Uploading/downloading softwareAvailable 
4Conversion and developmentAvailable 
5Content management systemAvailable 
 Total50

 

All of the five software features identified are available among sampled publishers. This implies that the basic software reported by Nwankwo (2005) to be unavailable is now available.

 

Table 4: Identified Software Innovations.
Serial NumberConduit/Process FeaturesAvailableNot Available
1E–mail addressesAvailable 
2Web sitesAvailable 
3Internet facilityAvailable 
 Total30

 

The three conduit innovations that aid e–publishing through the Internet are available among the sampled publishers. The extent and pattern are discussed below.

 

Table 5: Identified E–publishing Skills.
Serial NumberE–publishing SkillsAvailableNot Available
1Production skillAvailable 
2Lithographic skillAvailable 
3Typesetting/design skillAvailable 
4Uploading/downloading skillAvailable 
 Total40

 

 

Table 6: Identified Marketing/Distribution Devices/Practices in Use.
Serial NumberDevice/PracticeAvailableNot Available
1Internet bookstores NA
2Print–on–DemandAvailable 
3Electronic Indexes/OPACAvailable 
4Internet Co–publishing NA
5E–serialisation NA
6E–pricing/fulfillment NA
7E–advertisementsAvailable 
8E–books in handsetsAvailable 
9Virtual libraries/schools/communities NA
 Total45

 

The level of Internet connectivity among cassette/CD publishers varies. Four, representing 50 percent, own e–mail addresses, three or 37.5 percent have Internet facilities while none has a Web site. This implies that four, or 50 percent, have no e–mail addresses while five or 62.5 percent are not connected to the Internet.

 

Table 7: E–marketing Practices Adopted by Print Book Publishers.
Serial NumberE–practiceNumber of ResponsesPercentageNumber of Titles
1Print–on–Demand731.81,150
2Diskettes000
3CD–ROM313.6327
4Via Internet bookstores313.6335
5Cassette tapes418.186
6Personal digital assistant000
7Print books with CD–ROM845.4565
8Online serialization00NA
9Internet co–publishing29.09NA
10Online book advertisements836.363,400
11E–publishing partnership1045.45NA
12E–book000
13Audio CD000

 

The nature of e–publishing is such that a publishing firm can enter the industry from the areas of editing and processing, printing, or marketing. The study therefore attempted to find out if the sampled publishers have adopted any e–marketing and distribution practices in the sale of their books.

Ten responses (45 percent) were returned from e–publishing partnerships. Among the practices indicated were editorial, design, consultancy, and sales collaborations that were not listed in the questionnaire. This is an indication of increase in global outlook by local publishers. Following this is online book advertisements, for which eight responses representing 36.36 percent were returned. It is also noteworthy that seven publishers (31.8 percent) are involved in Print on Demand (POD), all in partnership with the African Books Collective (ABC). None had produced e–books, books on diskettes, print books with CD–ROMs, or personal digital assistants (PDA). Three positive responses, representing 13.63 percent, were returned for CD–ROM, Internet bookstores and online books, while four (18.18 percent) and two (9.09 percent) were recorded for cassette tapes and Internet co–publishing.

 

Table 8: Electronic Book Products and Devices Published by Print Book Publishers.
Serial NumberProduct/DeviceResponsesPercent
1E–book00
2PDA00
3Microfilm00
4CD–ROM313.63
5Instant books00
6Books with CD–ROM00
7Books in audio CD00
8Books in cassette tapes29.09
9Books in diskettes00
 Total522.72

 

The table shows that three respondents indicated that they produced and published CD–ROMs while two respondents indicated that they published books in cassettes. The fact that the disc publishers indicated that at least one CD–ROM has been produced for a bank suggests that the responses might be valid. It is also possible for a publisher in the southwest to produce his e–book products outside the southwest. Why these products could not be found in any of the sampled bookshops cannot be easily explained.

 

Table 9: Publishers’ Electronic Book Production Devices.
Serial NumberE–productsNumber of RespondentsPercentNumber of Titles
1Audio cassettes2252
2Audio CD000
3CD–ROM112.51
4Microfilm000
5E–book000
6VCD000
7Master CD112.51
8No response (blank)4500
 Total522.72 

 

Having found by observation that the sampled publishers have hundreds of musical CDs, cassettes and VCDs to their credit, the study proceeded to find out if they have published any electronic books by any of these means. The data show that two respondents produced two titles in audio cassette for churches. One respondent produced a CD–ROM for a commercial bank while another produced a master CD–ROM for another client. They all believe that there is no demand for such products. No respondent produced books in audio CD, microfilm, VCD or e–books. Four respondents (50 percent) did not respond to the question.

Conclusion

From the analysed data, it is safe to conclude that e–publishing has many interesting features that are easy and cost effective to adopt in Nigeria. Many of these innovations have been adopted by the majority of local publishers.

Innovations that aid setting, editing, digitizing, uploading and downloading book products are already adopted by a reasonable number of publishers. They seem to be afraid, however, of exploring the local market possibilities for fear of lack of energy infrastructures, appropriate reading habits and computer literacy. For this reason they concentrate on the global market by selling e–products to foreigners through the London–based African Book Collective and by distributing imported e–products to local readers. In case they care to develop the CD–ROM and audio CD markets, however, the technology appears to be available.

Printing hardware has not changed much with only 28 percent adoption for machines with digital facilities, sometimes for the printing of annual reports, calendars and outdoor posters rather than books. The CD replication studios seem to have concluded that Nigerians are not ready for book products. They have therefore turned their attention to music CDs. Their face–off with the Copyrights Commission seems to suggest that they are having a field day in the music sub–sector. In a story with the headline “NCC Seizes Pirated CDs, DVDs, Worth N10 Million in Lagos” The Punch (2007) painted a picture of the battle raging between the NCC and the replication studios:

“Yesterday (Wednesday) we dealt with replication outfits that refused to comply with the rules and regulations. To ensure that piracy is tamed at source, the Optical Disc Regulations (Act) was enacted. But up till now many of the operators have not complied with the rules.”

The essence of the above statement is to buttress the conclusion that the technology for the local production of optical discs has been widely adopted, but employed in the production of musical rather than book products.

Recommendations

In light of the innovations adopted, the ones not yet adopted, limited application of the innovations, and the infrastructural, cultural and educational constraints identified, the following proposals are recommended:

References

Adio, G. 2004. “The role of information communication technologies in the dissemination of information: a new challenge for librarians.” Nigerian Library and Information Science Review 22, no.2: 37–42.

Nwankwo, V. 2005. “Print on demand: an African publisher’s experience.” In Adesanoye and Ojeniyi (eds.) Issues in book publishing in Nigeria. Ibadan: Heinemann Educational Books.

Nwodu, L.C. 2001. “Research and ICT’s relevance in innovation diffusion.” Nigerian Journal of Communications 4, nos.1/2: 100–108.

Obidiegwu, O. 2006. “Enhancing productivity in the publishing industry.” The Publisher 13, no. 1: 3–10.

The Punch. 2007. Friday, December 14: 50.

Uchenunu, S.A. 2005. “D.I. printing in Nigeria: what impact?.” Printers Digest 25, September/October: 22–24.

About the authors

Emmanuel Ifeduba, Dept. of Communication & Language Arts, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.

Godwin Shoki, PhD, Dept. of Communication & Language Arts, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Direct comments to: Shokend1 [at] yahoo [dot] co [dot] uk